
Excerpt 3 – “End in Tears” by Ruth Rendell
Ruth Rendell takes a very different approach to crime fiction – blood and gore, witty detectives searching for the killer and no matter what the hindrances, always conclude the story with a “Who Dunnit?”, elegantly portrayed in an archetypal Poirot fashion; these all come to mind when I think of the swarms of books lined on the shelves of libraries or bookstores or even in my English teacher’s bedroom! I therefore completely agree with Mr. Savage when he says that the crime fiction genre has been repeated in many different ways, but all with a streak of distinct similarity. I think it’s time for a change and I believe Miss Rendell had done just that. I would like to start with the way she allows us as readers to psychologically understand the mentality of the killer. He appears to me to be an amateur in the crime game due to his uncertainty and lack of confidence in finding the right person to murder. On the contrary, the whole basis of the killing isn’t typical; I doubt a lump of concrete is the ideal murder weapon you would choose if writing an excerpt for this genre! Moving away from poison, guns and knives, it may seem ludicrous to pick concrete over ammunition, for example, yet this is what makes it original and eye – catching. You hear about it on the news; teenagers on bridges throwing bricks at passing vehicles – it’s just not eponymous to the usual way we depict murder as being a “glamorous act of the affluent”. Sherlock Holmes, Agatha Christie’s Poirot, Miss Marple and Partners in Crime all echo this statement. Lastly, I would like to point out that the synopsis may be an effete cliché in real life, yet it is something I have never strolled across in my experience of reading!
Ruth Rendell takes a very different approach to crime fiction – blood and gore, witty detectives searching for the killer and no matter what the hindrances, always conclude the story with a “Who Dunnit?”, elegantly portrayed in an archetypal Poirot fashion; these all come to mind when I think of the swarms of books lined on the shelves of libraries or bookstores or even in my English teacher’s bedroom! I therefore completely agree with Mr. Savage when he says that the crime fiction genre has been repeated in many different ways, but all with a streak of distinct similarity. I think it’s time for a change and I believe Miss Rendell had done just that. I would like to start with the way she allows us as readers to psychologically understand the mentality of the killer. He appears to me to be an amateur in the crime game due to his uncertainty and lack of confidence in finding the right person to murder. On the contrary, the whole basis of the killing isn’t typical; I doubt a lump of concrete is the ideal murder weapon you would choose if writing an excerpt for this genre! Moving away from poison, guns and knives, it may seem ludicrous to pick concrete over ammunition, for example, yet this is what makes it original and eye – catching. You hear about it on the news; teenagers on bridges throwing bricks at passing vehicles – it’s just not eponymous to the usual way we depict murder as being a “glamorous act of the affluent”. Sherlock Holmes, Agatha Christie’s Poirot, Miss Marple and Partners in Crime all echo this statement. Lastly, I would like to point out that the synopsis may be an effete cliché in real life, yet it is something I have never strolled across in my experience of reading!
Sins & Skeletons
“Murder. Isn’t it a terrible thing? A thing used by cowards to run away from the truth. Tell me. When you found out your daughter was pregnant, how did you feel? Being a lawyer, you’ve got an image to uphold. Good old Richard - always comes out smelling of roses. But not this time, oh no! Surely news like this would be unspeakable to talk about over a spiffing Friday luncheon? But gossip travels, Mr. Sandford. And you couldn’t bear the thought of the disapproving sniffs on the staircase; the pointing in the common room. Does it remind you of your childhood? The only boy in the whole year who got into St. Andrew’s with a scholarship! Now that is something! Even today, you told your colleagues you had to look after a sick aunt! Is this what you thrive on? Not only are you a murderer; a murderer who kills his own flesh and blood, but you’re a pathological liar, as well!”
“I didn’t do it.”
“Oh, and he speaks! It’s a shame that’s been repeated at least four times this past half hour!”
Silence gave Lorna the opportunity to appraise Richard for what he really was, behind the thick grey hair and lightly tanned skin. He was much more modest than David Dickinson and with his chiselled features and laurel – green eyes, he was rather attractive for a man suffering from a “midlife – crisis”. However, stress had begun to take its toll – bags hung like curtains underneath his eyes and deep – set wrinkles ran paths around his face; telling a thousand tales of hardship, despair and pain.
“I know you suffered from schizophrenia and clinical depression. Wouldn’t it be so easy to just lose it? To asphyxiate your daughter and regret it afterwards. Or, was it done out of malice? Pure malice. We can only find your DNA on Jennifer. You are the main suspect.”
Richard narrowly averted his eyes. Was this a sign of guilt? Losing his wife to lung cancer a year before his fourteen – year old son committed suicide must have made him weaker; made him disintegrate; made him prone to insanity.
Suddenly, a stabbing pain sliced through her temple; she quickly gulped down a much needed glass of warm water, obtained from her cluttered desk. It was all the stress of not getting any significant leads in this investigation. Tired and irritable, all Lorna wanted to do was to soak in her bath or sleep to the lullaby of opera on BBC Radio 3. You could call her a female Inspector Morse – a Mark 2 Jaguar sleeps in her garage and she hasn’t had her fair share of successful relationships over the years. The only startling difference was the sleek and straight waist – length red hair that she sported simply in a high ponytail.
A whole hour had passed and she had achieved nothing: something in life which she detested. She decided to call it a day.
“The interrogation with Mr. Richard Sandford ended at 19:02,” and she pressed the stop button on the recorder. The security guard led Richard out of the interview room and back into his cell. While Lorna rustled her papers, she couldn't help but wonder what it feels like to not know how long you have left in police custody - if you'll ever breathe freedom again. She spent the next three minutes placing empty and replete plastic sheets into her floral monochrome paper file; and after completing this errand, she walked out, locking the door behind her. Once out of the police station, she pulled her pink cashmere cardigan closer to her body, as she quickly paced towards the car park; it may have been summer but a brisk wind hung in the shadows, making her hair flutter in the wind.
As she neared her Jaguar, she immediately realised that her car had been somewhat damaged. She hurried towards it, her white ballerina pumps silent on the ground. Her eyes weren’t deceiving her. The car was vandalised, not just by a group of mindless thugs who put Banksy to shame, but a manipulative fiend set out to intimidate Lorna. She’d had harmless death threats in the past; it was her job – controversial and notorious in the media. But this was different. This had meaning. A prominent claw – mark had been scratched onto the bonnet and six words etched in beautiful calligraphic writing were sat next to it: “I’ve got her. Now pay me.”
“A ransom. He’s back . . .”
A whole hour had passed and she had achieved nothing: something in life which she detested. She decided to call it a day.
“The interrogation with Mr. Richard Sandford ended at 19:02,” and she pressed the stop button on the recorder. The security guard led Richard out of the interview room and back into his cell. While Lorna rustled her papers, she couldn't help but wonder what it feels like to not know how long you have left in police custody - if you'll ever breathe freedom again. She spent the next three minutes placing empty and replete plastic sheets into her floral monochrome paper file; and after completing this errand, she walked out, locking the door behind her. Once out of the police station, she pulled her pink cashmere cardigan closer to her body, as she quickly paced towards the car park; it may have been summer but a brisk wind hung in the shadows, making her hair flutter in the wind.
As she neared her Jaguar, she immediately realised that her car had been somewhat damaged. She hurried towards it, her white ballerina pumps silent on the ground. Her eyes weren’t deceiving her. The car was vandalised, not just by a group of mindless thugs who put Banksy to shame, but a manipulative fiend set out to intimidate Lorna. She’d had harmless death threats in the past; it was her job – controversial and notorious in the media. But this was different. This had meaning. A prominent claw – mark had been scratched onto the bonnet and six words etched in beautiful calligraphic writing were sat next to it: “I’ve got her. Now pay me.”
“A ransom. He’s back . . .”
Hi Stardust,
ReplyDeleteYour analysis of the Ruth Rendell excerpt is extremely perceptive and sophisticated and I’m really impressed with your crime piece. Your writing voice is strong and compelling, your opening immediately gripping. Lorna is a very well drawn character, sharp and feisty but with chinks of vulnerability, and you’ve included some nice, telling details about her - that she likes opera, has red hair (‘length’ red? Do you mean long red?).
I wonder if it’s necessary to spell it out that she’s a female Inspector Morse? Perhaps that’s something you could allow the reader to deduce.
There are some lovely descriptions too. I particularly like ‘...a brisk wind hung in the shadows...’
Your writing is wonderfully fluent. Occasionally, you could tighten it up a little and think again about some of the words you use. Perhaps look up ‘eponymous’ and ‘effete’ in the dictionary and see if you still feel they fit. ‘Richard narrowly averted his eyes.’ I’m not sure how he would do this. I’d suggest having him either narrow or avert his eyes.
Up until you mentioned ‘interview room’ I imagined the scene was taking place in a courtroom, and therefore wondered about the warm water on the cluttered desk. You may want to mention the interview room sooner?
Just to be aware - your extract is over 700 words not including the analysis.
Fantastic work. I enjoyed it. Very well done!
Joanne
STARDUST,
ReplyDeleteImpressive analysis of “End in Tears”, I like that you talk about the differences in crime fiction, and how this is something new to you. I’m glad that it’s unique and that it’ll help you grow as a writer, even if crime fiction doesn’t end up being your preference. It shows that you know crime fiction quite well, and that too, is very good to see. It’s really put an extra dimension into your analysis.
Very well done with your part two. I’m glad to see your natural vocabulary still in use, and even more so to see that you’re using it appropriately and beautifully. You’ve used it in all the right places. The use of elegantly placed words are so effective, and I think can be even more so in crime fiction. So, as always, great job there.
I also like the way this story develops. The reader is introduced to a story – of Richard – and soaks it in with the details of his face and his own personal crime, but by the end (and I hope there’s more!) the real crime and story surface. I really enjoyed how you did that. Also, the allusion to Inspector Morse is a nice touch.
You give Lorna a voice immediately, and that is very good. I love the line “Good old Richard - always comes out smelling of roses”, I thought it was just lovely – a different way to announce his apparent goodness. I also quite like “bags hung like curtains underneath his eyes and deep – set wrinkles ran paths around his face; telling a thousand tales of hardship, despair and pain,” but I think that you only need to use one descriptive word, instead of three. Sometimes, having more adjectives is crucial, but I think you’ve set up this sentence so nicely, that it only calls for one very strong word - “despair” is the strongest of the three.
You’ve done a great job here. I hope that you’ve continued this story for yourself, I think it has a lot of potential.
Well done STARDUST.
Genevieve
Hey,
ReplyDeleteGreat work on the analysis. It's clear that given thought to writing techniques in relation to their genre. You're right to enjoy that the style of murder is one that transcends the cludo-like cliches of old-fashioned crime fiction.
You've created a really good, meaty piece. The confrontational dialogue is a cool opening. It's set the tone for what follows, and got my attention. It's good to be thrown right into things.
With this is mind you don't need to worry about setting us up with snippets of exposition. You've done it skillfully, so be proud, but remarks such as,'at least four times this past half hour' take us back, away from the moment, away from the tension you've built.
You're sensory stuff in concise and evocative, but, as a picky point, beware of the word 'suddenly.' It shows awareness towards your genre, because that crops up a lot in crime fiction, but I think you don't need it in your writing (unless it's really, really necessary).
Just to clarify - you've built an atmospheric scene, and you have no problems holding my attention, so there's no need to signpost anything - it's enough to decribe the feeling well, which you've done with a 'stabbing pain that sliced...' It's great.
Also, try to show things, more than tell. So saying 'it was the stress of not finding leads' that caused the headache could be shown - have her gulp down the water, look at her note, read a little, showing there are a bunch of crossed off leads, then have her frown and shove the notes away - that kind of thing.
Nice inclusion of David Dickinson, by the way.
You should be seriously proud of your writing - any comments here aren't criticism - I just want to help you with the picky stuff that can bog you down later.
Take care,
Andy